23
May
How many bosses do you have who hover? One of them may be doing it for the right reasons!

How many bosses do you have who hover? One of them may be doing it for the right reasons!

Micromanagement has a bad name, and the image of the hovering, interfering, controlling boss is universally condemned as poor leadership.

But, we all micromanage our staff to varying degrees, and it has its place as a leadership tool as long as it is kept under control and has an end-point.

We recently found an interesting summary on ExecuNet.com full of senior executive perspectives on the utility of micromanagement. Their comments supported our position that selective use of the tool has a role to play in leadership. Here is a sampling of their quotes:

“Because micromanagement is generally used as a negative term, it doesn’t sit quite right with me. However, if it plays out as additional guidance, coaching, mentoring or monitoring in the face of poor results with the purpose of empowering the person being micromanaged, then yes, by all means, micromanagement may be necessary.” —Claire Cronier, FOUNDER AND CEO Continue reading

19
May
the hiring moment

Remember that feeling? Recapture it!

While we were researching a recent blog post about the marketing company HubSpot and its intensive focus on developing a highly productive corporate culture, one of us came across a related post on LinkedIn by the CTO of HubSpot, Darmesh Shah, which deserved a little attention of its own:

Ten Ways to be Sensationally Successful at Your New Job

This is very compelling, because everyone starts a new job with a head of steam, full of energy and ready to contribute at a high level. Most people quickly lose that head of steam, and end up cruising along with the pack, as Shah says “where every day feels the same and your new job quickly seems just like the old job.”

How do you avoid that sub-optimizing trap? It’s all up to you.

We will summarize Mr. Shah’s points and add our own take, as we always do!

NOTE: If you are a seasoned employee, you can benefit from these ideas, too. Simply embed the mindset that you have just been hired, and think about how your job and your work environment look to a new hire. What would you see? What action would you take to improve things? Think about the following advice with that in mind:

1. Pretend you are still interviewing for the job for the first six months. Work hard to prove that your skill set and leadership are worth keeping and developing.

2. Start a project that leverages your experience to solve issues in your new organization. Involve peers in the work, especially those who may benefit from the result.

3. Embed the mindset that you are “here to help.” That means helping everyone:

  • Work on your boss’ challenges without waiting for a direct invitation.
  • Volunteer to join a work team with a big project that is struggling.
  • Seek help from others, then offer help to those same people immediately thereafter.

4. Take action without prompting. Seek areas that could benefit from new thinking, and focus your personal projects on those areas of opportunity.

As Shah says:

“You don’t have to wait to be asked. You don’t have to wait to be assigned. Pick a side project where, if you fail, there’s no harm and no foul, and take your shot. You never know how it will turn out… and what it will do for your career.”

Some of you would say that this is not ground-breaking stuff, yet too many employees fall into a cruising rhythm and lose that “head of steam.” So covering this topic seems like it still has a great deal of utility. In fact, we talk about it regularly.

When you get to work tomorrow, rehire yourself and assess your situation as a new employee would, especially one with a skill set like yours. What project would you start first?

Let us know what you figure out!

11
Apr

This is the second in a series of posts about the most read articles in the McKinsey Quarterly, the management consultancy’s free online business magazine. (Free registration is required to view the articles.)

Time Management

OK, now fit two more projects into this day.
image source: mftrou.com

This article, ranked second on the most-read list, takes a new angle at the eternal Time Management issue by pinning the blame not just on the individual, but on the organization. We work with clients constantly on individual time management skills, but we do see the authors’ point: Employees can operate at the peak of time efficiency, and still not always successfully manage the endless number of projects that keep piling up.

The Organization Assumption: Every Employee’s Time is Limitless Continue reading

5
Apr

A recent Aberdeen Group study on human capital management trends found firms with HR departments that are aligned with business goals are able to better plan for future talent needs and integrate workforce and talent initiatives. If Aberdeen is going to call out what should be an obvious business success factor, they must have found that insuring business goal alignment is a competitive advantage that only some organizations achieve. In other words, most organizations are not managing to achieve goal alignment between senior executives and HR executives.

Goal alignment - Not a one-way street

Here’s a common mistake: These arrows must point in BOTH directions. Information and recommendations flowing up underpin goals flowing down.
image source: www.peoplestreme.com

How can HR’s goals get out of alignment with organizational goals, if departmental goals are founded on strategic goals that come from “the top?” In fact, given that the Human Resource function is designed to support organizational goals through the sourcing and retention of talent, it should strike all of us as obvious that aligning HR goals to organizational goals would be a priority. Jack Welch, during his successful tenure as head of General Electric, famously had his top HR executive deeply involved in strategic matters to achieve that alignment.

How can such a clear connection be missed by so many organizations?

The most common way that HR goals drift away from strategic goals is when the developers of the strategic goals do not clearly and transparently communicate those goals (and their rationale) to the people running HR. Without clear and regular communication (Communication that Counts, in our Foundations of Excellence philosophy), a department head has to create their own goals in a vacuum.

Of course, great communication is a two-way street: HR leaders must actively seek this information, asking not only to understand the motivations behind the goals, but also for a chance to participate in their development.

How can HR best contribute actively to goal-setting? Here are a few ideas to consider:

  • Provide data to help senior executives understand the gaps that may exist between the human resources available, and those needed to achieve particular goals.
  • Work with other departments to help them provide productivity data to support strategic planning.
  • Gather data on the relative benefits of training and development targeted at retention, and the costs of higher turnover on productivity.

HR Daily Advisor provides a list of starting points for collecting HR metrics for C-suite impact. We think the training and development section should also include detailed tracking of individual productivity improvements during and after training initiatives, with dollars assigned to each item as either savings or new revenue.

At the end of every financial quarter or year, HR should be able to report how its activities supported organizational goals by improving skills, productivity, retention and cost-containment (for benefits, say.) Senior executives will appreciate the insight into how best to align human assets with organizational goals, and how the work HR does raises employee engagement and, therefore, productivity.

25
Mar
Three employee engagement drivers second nature for all leaders.

Make our three engagement drivers second nature and you will win a lot of competitions!

Countless studies support the proposition that stronger employee engagement raises productivity. Yet, organizations still struggle with it:

  • 29% of employees declare themselves engaged, according to this year’s annual Gallup survey.
  • The other 71% are either disengaged or, worse, completely unengaged.

We know why: Employee engagement can only be sustained over time in an organization that adopts a ‘mindset of engagement’ and makes all the drivers of engagement second nature for every leader at every level. There are multiple drivers. We touched on just nine of them in this month’s newsletter.

We can condense the message down from nine to three: Here are the overriding personal and corporate mindsets that we focus on when building an engaged workforce:

A reverence for the truth –Real information can be shared up and down the chain of command without assigning blame or retribution. Pressing through assumptions to facts should be valued. Bad behavior should be addressed as a teaching moment, with curative rather than punitive responses.

Clarity of communication – Share goals, aspirations, challenges and hurdles. Ask for input. Value the input. Act on the input. Give credit to the source for good input.

Building a high level of trust – Fulfill promises. “Tuesday is Tuesday,” not Wednesday or Friday. Never throw anyone “under a bus,” aside from yourself. Accept full personal accountability for past results, and be a leader in solving problems. Ask not “why did this happen?” Ask “What can I do to fix it?”

There is no quick fix for a lack of engagement. Your organization earns it from each employee through the actions of its leaders over time. It is far easier to lose engagement (especially the underpinning trust) than it is to earn it, so you can never take a day off! That is why it must be a mindset rather than a program.

What do you think of our three key drivers, or our nine more tactical areas of focus? Let us know!

18
Mar

This does not have to be the bane of a manager’s existence this week!

The third week of March is a frustrating one for every corporate leader, as filling out brackets for the office pool and watching the score-scroll on ESPN.com or Yahoo Sports seem to drain a measurable percentage of productivity from your otherwise hard-working staff.

A client just last Friday expressed mild apprehension about how much work he might get out of his sports-obsessed staff. Our advice? Go with the flow, and minimize March Madness distractions by converting them into a chance to build employee engagement.

This makes sense because:

  • You can’t fight American culture – filling out a bracket for the office pool has become a fixture of the “things we do together” at work. Continue reading

28
Feb
Yahoo CEO Marissa Meyer tells her employees to get back to their desks, then get up and walk around! Credit: loosechange.co.za

Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer tells her employees to get back to their desks, then get up and walk around!
Image credit: loosechange.co.za

If you missed the recent media kerfuffle over Yahoo’s decision to significantly reduce work-at-home options for their employees, you missed a great example of how senior executives can have the best intentions, but cause as much harm as good by taking the wrong approach to implementing their vision.

Yahoo takes the position that working at home deprives the employee of that creative day-to-day interaction employees get when working in an office. Innovation happens best through collaboration, which is facilitated when people are physically in the same place.

This article from Deborah Kotz on Boston.com did a nice job of objectively discussing the pros and cons of work-at-home arrangements.

Here is a strong defense of CEO Marissa Mayer’s decision to eliminate work-at-home arrangements.

From the outside looking in, we cannot gauge what drove Mayer to make such a sweeping decree. Continue reading

18
Dec

Occasionally, we find inspirational quotes that have a grain of truth, but don’t quite “hit their marks,” as actors say. We found the following in a Leadership Quotes calendar for 2012, and wondered just how they applied to the environment in which leaders must work in the 21st Century

“Stop thinking, and end your problems.”

~Lao-Tsu

We are all guilty of “overthink,” which leads to analysis paralysis. But the idea that not thinking a problem through makes it go away seems unproductive, to say the least!

“Of that which you see, believe only a little. Of that which you are told, nothing.”

~Spanish proverb

We agree that you need to challenge assumptions and other “accepted wisdom” when exploring data and making decisions. That is the spirit of our Pursuit of Truth leadership philosophy. Continue reading

15
Dec

It has become an article of faith in business that collaboration fosters innovation. “Many hands make light work, and many brains make better ideas and solutions.”

Yet, evidence can be found that hyper-collaboration is not always as productive as solitary work done away from the maddening crowd of the open-office environment.

Great Minds Need Private Time

Writer Susan Cain, in an opinion piece in the New York Times, argues that we have become too reliant on collaboration as a path to innovation and problem solving. She cites a great example of how Steve Wozniak first developed the original Apple computer: Time away from his collaborators proved critical in pushing along the development process.

For Ms. Cain, this highlights how solitary work has lost its place in our professional lives. She blames “groupthink” on the debasement of alone-time as a productive form of creative thinking. She has a point, and makes a good case for the downside of relentless collaboration. (We certainly agree with her position on brainstorming.) Continue reading

31
Oct

Hiroshi Mikitani, CEO of an e-commerce company called Rakuten, an online shopping website for Japanese merchandise, put a short post on LinkedIn this week about “common sense” being a hurdle to success in some instances. He cites the advice he got against launching his most recent company, which he characterized as “commonsense advice” against entering what looked like a crowded marketplace.

The post is brief, so we don’t have details about how Mr. Mikitani winkled out his business opportunity in the “red ocean” of e-commerce, but it resonated with us because his complaint aligns with our own “pursuit of truth” philosophy. Rather than “common sense,” we would call it “accepted wisdom” or “opinions masquerading as facts.”

Indeed, with a due respect to the point Mr. Mikitani has made, we would like to reclaim “common sense” from negative connotations, because we like a commonsense approach to problems and opportunities that involves applying the Pursuit of Truth tenet to all decision-making.

There were a number of comments under Mr. Mikitani’s article that took our position on what constitutes common sense, so we feel encouraged that commonsense business decision making founded on the pursuit of truth will continue to be great leadership practice.

Semantics aside, the success of Rakuten makes clear that business decision-making needs to focus on the truth, or as much of it as can be found, rather than the short-cuts of assumptions, even those based on “years of experience.”

Change is our only constant, and the past is not necessarily prologue to the future!

Does this makes sense? What do you think?